I have a love-hate relationship with John Eldredge (author of Journey of Desire, Waking the Dead, Wild at Heart, etc.)
When Mark and I got engaged, we were attending Life Group at Deane & Erika Johnson's house, where we were going through Waking the Dead. I loved that book. So much of it really spoke to Mark's and my hearts. When we were thinking about and preparing our wedding ceremony, we wanted a lot of what was said to reflect on the heart as the place where God dwells, where our truest selves are found, and where our most intimate relationships take their form - all ideas that we learned from reading Waking the Dead. Even now, after a year and a half of marriage, Mark and I come back to our hearts and what's going on in them. When I'm withdrawn and struggling, or even when Mark just wants to feel close to me, he'll say, "What is your heart saying right now?" And I'll reflect on it and then tell him. We have some of our most intimate conversations that way.
I also really loved Journey of Desire. I read it while I was going through the Discipleship Training Institute (DTI) at Grace Ministries. Mark read it shortly after we got married. We both loved the book, loved the idea of not being afraid to desire, of living life freely in pursuit of our deepest desires and not being afraid that they'll ruin or control us.
I never read Wild at Heart. It's mainly a book for men, but I've always heard that it has a lot to say to/for women as well. Mark has read it though, so I have some idea of what it says.
And here's the thing. Between Journey of Desire and Wild at Heart, I think that John Eldredge says some amazing things and says some things that bind people up. Because when Mark is struggling in his heart, what I hear coming from him are expectations he has on himself to be something "more" - that he should feel more purpose in life, that he should have more vision for leading his family and friends. And I think these ideas come at least partly from Eldredge's writing. He's so inspiring with all his talk of adventure and pursuing your desires, but at the same time, when life is kind of quiet and mundane - which, honestly, it is most of the time - it makes you feel as though something is missing, as if YOU are lacking something, as if life should be so much more. Eldredge gives the idea that you are "settling" for less, that it's not what God wants for our lives and we should get out there and live adventurously. And I think that's a load of crap.
I look at my husband every day and am amazed and so grateful for this person that God saw fit to give me to walk through life with. Mark is such a REAL person. He is honest and lives life from his heart, never wanting to settle for the superficial or the things this world tells you are necessary to have "life". On the surface I guess our life is kind of quiet and mundane. We spend a lot of time at home, we don't watch tv or play video games or shop or go out a lot. We read, we have our friends over for dinner, we play card games. But I feel like our life is so rich. It's so much more meaningful and beautiful than what this world tries to sell us.
And as for "leading", I know that Mark leads his family and his friends. He leads them into their truer selves and into a more intimate relationship with their maker. I know that, for me, personally, I feel so much freer since marrying Mark to be who I am, to really discover and pursue what my heart desires and not be afraid or ashamed of it. (What has amazed me has been that my desires are all centered around family. I never thought I was that way, but I find that my joy comes from taking care of my husband and stepdaughter and the little baby that's on the way.)
I know so many other people would say something similar. That they feel so accepted by Mark, so free to delve into the deeper, darker parts of their hearts in his presence, knowing that he is going to listen and not judge and walk with them through their journey.
So I get really pissed off when I hear Mark doubting himself, doubting his meaning, his purpose, his worth in this world - thinking it should be "more". I blame Eldredge. I mean, I guess it's really just the enemy, but he uses Eldredge's writings.
Mark and I were talking about this a little this morning, and I realized that Eldredge seems to be on the right track with all his desire and adventure talk, but I think where he goes too far is when he tries to tell you what that should look like. Who is he to determine that for us? Mark and I agreed this morning to begin praying that God would reveal to Mark what his true heart desires. That he would reveal the difference between expectations placed on Mark by outside influences and the desires that God has placed uniquely in Mark's heart alone. Because we're not all meant to be like each other. I didn't marry or want to marry John Eldredge. I married Mark Rothnie - that's the man I want. Not some idea of a man projected on to him by someone who had nothing to do with the formation of his being.
Tuesday, March 21, 2006
Monday, March 20, 2006
Friday, March 17, 2006
Les Photos du Jour
"Mmm ... that sounds good. I'll have that."
.....................
We visited the Signorinis on Kathy's birthday.

They have two dogs, Emmett and Ben ...

Emmett seems to think he's a lapdog, but Catri didn't mind ...

.............................
Catri the Hamper Head ...

Attack of the Hamper Head ...

......................
Catri studying science in her daddy's lap. Yes, she's 13, but she's still a daddy's girl.

..................................
I tried to tell Frankie that it wasn't very nice to put his legs like that on Olly's head, but he didn't listen ...
.....................
We visited the Signorinis on Kathy's birthday.

They have two dogs, Emmett and Ben ...

Emmett seems to think he's a lapdog, but Catri didn't mind ...

.............................
Catri the Hamper Head ...

Attack of the Hamper Head ...

......................
Catri studying science in her daddy's lap. Yes, she's 13, but she's still a daddy's girl.

..................................
I tried to tell Frankie that it wasn't very nice to put his legs like that on Olly's head, but he didn't listen ...
Tuesday, March 14, 2006
Turn around and run the other way!!!
Mark and I are attending childbirth classes this month. There are four classes, about 2 hours each, held once a week. We attended the first class last week. It was pretty much a review of what we already knew from our pregnancy books - mainly about how the baby develops and reaches full term.
This week they began talking about what they call "labor". The midwife leading the class had a little doll with an umbilical cord attached to a fake placenta all inside a little bag representing the amniotic sac, or "bag of waters". She also had another little toy that looked like a pelvis. She put the baby in the pelvis and pulled it through, representing another thing they call "birth". She also passed around a plastic representation of what she called "dilation of the cervix", showing how the cervix supposedly dilates from 1 centimeter to 10 centimeters. It was all pretty interesting, but I knew she was lying to us. All this talk about the baby descending and turning and the cervix dilating and blah blah blah. WHATEVER! I know my body won't do that. It's physically impossible. They're lying.
Later on during the class, we watched a video of three different women "giving birth". At first it kind of freaked me out and made me think all this stuff might be true, but then I realized, "It's just a movie." Amazing what they can do with special effects nowadays.
Mark and I have noticed from time to time what looks like a heron or crane around our neighborhood. He's a beautiful bird, and sometimes he'll hang out on the roof of one of our neighbor's houses, just looking around. I realize now that this must be the stork, coming to make sure he knows the way to our house so he can bring us the baby.
See, because what really happens is that you go to sleep, and then when you wake up, there's your baby! The stork brought her! Although the midwife last night referred to this as an "emergency C-section", I knew what the truth was.
This week they began talking about what they call "labor". The midwife leading the class had a little doll with an umbilical cord attached to a fake placenta all inside a little bag representing the amniotic sac, or "bag of waters". She also had another little toy that looked like a pelvis. She put the baby in the pelvis and pulled it through, representing another thing they call "birth". She also passed around a plastic representation of what she called "dilation of the cervix", showing how the cervix supposedly dilates from 1 centimeter to 10 centimeters. It was all pretty interesting, but I knew she was lying to us. All this talk about the baby descending and turning and the cervix dilating and blah blah blah. WHATEVER! I know my body won't do that. It's physically impossible. They're lying.
Later on during the class, we watched a video of three different women "giving birth". At first it kind of freaked me out and made me think all this stuff might be true, but then I realized, "It's just a movie." Amazing what they can do with special effects nowadays.
Mark and I have noticed from time to time what looks like a heron or crane around our neighborhood. He's a beautiful bird, and sometimes he'll hang out on the roof of one of our neighbor's houses, just looking around. I realize now that this must be the stork, coming to make sure he knows the way to our house so he can bring us the baby.
See, because what really happens is that you go to sleep, and then when you wake up, there's your baby! The stork brought her! Although the midwife last night referred to this as an "emergency C-section", I knew what the truth was.
Wednesday, March 8, 2006
Monday, March 6, 2006
Bumps and Flip-Flops
I'm turning into a navel-gazer.
In the evenings, usually around 6:00 until I go to bed, Gwennan wakes up and makes her presence known. She bumps and kicks and flips around. It's so fascinating to pull my shirt up over my belly and just watch. My belly will go lop-sided, or a big wave will go across it, or just little bumps over here, then over there. I just sit there and stare at it in wonder and delight.
It amazes me how my emotions have taken off concerning this little person. I love her so much and I've never even met her. I don't know what she'll look like or what her personality will be, but I feel a fierce kind of protective love for her. It's such a strong feeling that sometimes it causes me anxiety, because I worry about her being healthy and coming out okay. Especially with all the stuff that's been going on with Catri's mom lately. The stress that Mark and I have been under trying to deal with her and the child support and visitation issues has been unbelievable and sometimes I fear that it will send me into premature labor. So I've just been praying a lot that God will keep Gwennan healthy and in my belly until she is fully formed and ready to come out. And that he will help me to let go of all this anxiety and worry and focus on what really matters - Mark, Catri and Gwennan and the happiness of our little family together.
In the evenings, usually around 6:00 until I go to bed, Gwennan wakes up and makes her presence known. She bumps and kicks and flips around. It's so fascinating to pull my shirt up over my belly and just watch. My belly will go lop-sided, or a big wave will go across it, or just little bumps over here, then over there. I just sit there and stare at it in wonder and delight.
It amazes me how my emotions have taken off concerning this little person. I love her so much and I've never even met her. I don't know what she'll look like or what her personality will be, but I feel a fierce kind of protective love for her. It's such a strong feeling that sometimes it causes me anxiety, because I worry about her being healthy and coming out okay. Especially with all the stuff that's been going on with Catri's mom lately. The stress that Mark and I have been under trying to deal with her and the child support and visitation issues has been unbelievable and sometimes I fear that it will send me into premature labor. So I've just been praying a lot that God will keep Gwennan healthy and in my belly until she is fully formed and ready to come out. And that he will help me to let go of all this anxiety and worry and focus on what really matters - Mark, Catri and Gwennan and the happiness of our little family together.
Friday, March 3, 2006
King Kong - or why Peter Jackson is a twisted individual
Okay, Dawn commented on her blog (dawndorathy.blogspot.com) on the movie King Kong, which we had seen together at the buck-75 movie along with Charles and Mark, and so now I feel obligated to share my thoughts on it too, which could probably be best summarized by the word, "AAAAAAHH!!!"
I've vowed not to see any more Peter Jackson movies after seeing King Kong. I liked The Lord of the Rings trilogy for the most part, but I have no desire to ever see it again. I hated the orcs and the big spider and all the icky creatures. Peter Jackson seems to take delight in devoting a lot of screen time to these critters at their most disturbing. Whereas some directors will spend maybe a few seconds too long dwelling on a beautiful landscape shot, Jackson likes to give you a few extra seconds to look at the green ooze drooling out of a rotten orc mouth or to watch as they are hacked to pieces right in front of you.
I thought it was basically the same deal with King Kong. The violence between the dinosaurs and King Kong, and the nasty bugs and bats on Skull Island were all too much for me. I had my eyes closed and head tucked into Mark's shoulder through about half the movie, with Mark saying, "Yeah, you shouldn't look right - OH MY GOD THAT'S GROSS!"
Especially disturbing were the demon-possessed Skull Island natives. They were suspiciously similar to the orcs in LOTR. Jackson spent a lot of screen time on them as they convulsed and drooled and their eyes rolled back in their rotted-teeth heads and they chanted evil curses and such. Again, I had to close my eyes through most of it.
I don't know what Peter Jackson's deal is, but he needs some serious psychiatric help.
And now for my true rant. WHY WAS THIS MOVIE RATED PG-13? I would never recommend a kid to see it, not Catri or anyone under 21. The violence was so disturbing. If you show somebody's rear-end in a movie, it gets an R rating. But a big ape killing a dinosaur by literally ripping its jaws in two gets a PG-13? What the heck?? I guess some people would argue it's "fantasy" violence, but with CGI technology nowadays, it looks pretty darn real and it still really WIGS ME OUT, MAN!
Okay, I'm done.
I've vowed not to see any more Peter Jackson movies after seeing King Kong. I liked The Lord of the Rings trilogy for the most part, but I have no desire to ever see it again. I hated the orcs and the big spider and all the icky creatures. Peter Jackson seems to take delight in devoting a lot of screen time to these critters at their most disturbing. Whereas some directors will spend maybe a few seconds too long dwelling on a beautiful landscape shot, Jackson likes to give you a few extra seconds to look at the green ooze drooling out of a rotten orc mouth or to watch as they are hacked to pieces right in front of you.
I thought it was basically the same deal with King Kong. The violence between the dinosaurs and King Kong, and the nasty bugs and bats on Skull Island were all too much for me. I had my eyes closed and head tucked into Mark's shoulder through about half the movie, with Mark saying, "Yeah, you shouldn't look right - OH MY GOD THAT'S GROSS!"
Especially disturbing were the demon-possessed Skull Island natives. They were suspiciously similar to the orcs in LOTR. Jackson spent a lot of screen time on them as they convulsed and drooled and their eyes rolled back in their rotted-teeth heads and they chanted evil curses and such. Again, I had to close my eyes through most of it.
I don't know what Peter Jackson's deal is, but he needs some serious psychiatric help.
And now for my true rant. WHY WAS THIS MOVIE RATED PG-13? I would never recommend a kid to see it, not Catri or anyone under 21. The violence was so disturbing. If you show somebody's rear-end in a movie, it gets an R rating. But a big ape killing a dinosaur by literally ripping its jaws in two gets a PG-13? What the heck?? I guess some people would argue it's "fantasy" violence, but with CGI technology nowadays, it looks pretty darn real and it still really WIGS ME OUT, MAN!
Okay, I'm done.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)